A couple additions or concerns:
Say you needed 100 hot units to satisfy yourself.
For arguments sake, what if you spent the first half of your day staring at ugliest naked women in the world? Would you still be at 0 hot units on the day, or would you be at -20, -100, maybe -10,000? Would you have to look at enough women to get to 0 and then back up to your required +100 hot units to end the day?
Also, is there a law of conservation of sex drive present? If so, you would need to balance out that +100 hot units sometime in your sleep, ie a compelling argument FOR nocturnal emissions. Or do your accumulated hot units simply radiate out in your sleep in the form of dreams? More on the conservation of hot units: Do women possess an infinite amount of these? I suppose they would have to, if everyone watching the thong song were satisfied.
I also think there should be some model for physical actions, weighted appropriately of course. Say you are physically spent twice in one day. You might spend the rest of the day playing vids or maybe making egg salad, but certainly no more hot units need be gained.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Interesting points. The scale works the same way as my tipping scale. It can't go negative; but it starts at 0 every time.
ReplyDeleteWomen only have infinite hot points in RL. If I became best friends with Mila Jivovich and I only hung out with her that would be more than enough credit to satisfy the theory. Contrast that with downloading a pamela anderson screen saver...not cutting it. Which moves me nicely into your point of being physically spent. In short, same rules apply. RL only counts.
What I am interested in though is an altered perception of RL. It is a well known fact that drinking makes everyone hot (probable misuse of the word 'everyone'). Could someone conceivable hang out with a five in the morning, get drunk, then hang out with them at night when they are upwards of a 7-8 and have that count?
This makes no sense to me at all.
ReplyDelete